When someone asks Google or ChatGPT about Georgia injury law, the answer they read is usually wrong — and it usually isn’t yours. StillCited keeps every claim your firm publishes sourced to primary authority and current when the statute moves, then watches which answers the engines actually cite.
Request an accuracy auditSee the Georgia libraryThe opening
We put thirteen real client questions to search and to the AI answer engines, then fact-checked every page that came back against the enrolled texts of SB 68 and SB 69. Two things were true at once: almost nothing was accurate, and nobody was winning.
Five of seven negligent security pages still publish the constructive knowledge standard — “should have known” — that SB 68 abolished in April 2025. One page carried a “last updated” stamp from two days before we read it and still described the collateral source rule as current Georgia law. Freshness stamps are being refreshed without the legal content being reviewed, which is exactly the signal retrieval systems trust most.
This is not negligence. A firm with four hundred pages cannot manually reconcile them against a legislative session, and until now nothing connected a change in the law to the pages that state it. But an answer engine that gets better at checking its sources — and they are getting better, quickly — will stop rewarding those pages. That is the opening, and it does not stay open.
Why this works
We looked at what the pages winning these questions had in common. It was not backlinks, domain age, or word count. It was three things — and all three are things a page can only have if somebody is actually maintaining it.
That is the whole thesis. The signals that win AI citations are accuracy signals, so accuracy and visibility are not two projects competing for the same budget — they are the same work. And of the pages currently winning on those signals, almost none are actually correct.
Which means the firms that will hold these answers in three years are the ones with a maintained claim library today. Not the ones with the biggest content budget.
What runs every night
Correcting your library once is a project. Holding the answer is not — because the law keeps moving, the engines keep changing their minds, and forty-five firms are all publishing. Six things run every night, and each one produces specific work rather than a report you have to interpret.
Your questions are put to Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Claude and we record who the answer cited — you, a competitor, or nobody.
We ask them directly, then check every claim in the answer against your own verified record. Contradictions open a correction task the same night.
Every claim’s source is re-checked on a schedule — not just for dead links, but for pages quietly edited underneath you.
Pages are re-graded against a standard for what a good answer looks like. When the standard moves, your library moves with it.
Search Console, page speed, indexing, structured data. Unglamorous, and the reason nothing silently falls out of the index.
Every change we apply is measured against its own baseline at seven and fourteen days. Wins and losses both get recorded.
Findings arrive as a queue, deduplicated — once you’ve handled or dismissed something, it never comes back to ask again. Your marketing coordinator works a short list. Nothing publishes to your site without a person approving it.
What we don’t promise: a ranking. No one controls what an AI answer says, and any vendor who tells you otherwise is selling you variance. We promise the inputs, the corrections, and an honest measurement of what changed.
How it works
Your attorneys answer the questions clients actually ask. Every factual claim in those answers traces to a statute, a case, or an agency source. When the underlying law moves, the claim is corrected once — and every page carrying it is found and brought back in line.
A real client question comes in, or you pick one worth winning. It’s routed to the right attorney.
They record sixty seconds from their phone. No login, no software to learn.
Every claim in the answer is bound to primary authority, with the date range it’s valid for.
It goes to your existing site as pages, FAQs and structured data — English and Spanish.
Sources are re-checked on a schedule. Legislative sessions and appellate decisions are monitored.
When the law changes, the claim is corrected once and every page carrying it is brought back in line.
Your website stays where it is. StillCited runs on its own infrastructure and publishes into your site — nothing about your stack changes, and nothing depends on our code staying up for your site to work.
The Georgia library
We maintain a canonical set of Georgia personal injury claims — each one sourced, dated, and marked with the period it’s valid for. It’s public, because the value isn’t in keeping it secret. It’s in keeping it true.
A personal injury action in Georgia must be brought within two years after the right of action accrues. The 2025 tort reform did not change this.
For negligent security, an invitee must show a particularized warning of imminent wrongful conduct, or the owner’s actual knowledge of substantially similar prior conduct on the premises, on adjacent premises, or within 500 yards — and that the wrongdoer exploited a specific physical condition of the premises known to the owner. Constructive knowledge no longer suffices.
Both the amounts charged for medical care and the amounts necessary to satisfy those charges under an insurance contract are admissible. The trier of fact determines reasonable value. This is not a paid-amounts-only rule.
A plaintiff who is 50% or more at fault recovers nothing; below that, recovery is reduced by their share. SB 68 did not alter this threshold.
Four of several hundred. The full Georgia personal injury library, with change history and effective ranges, is in progress.
Proof, not promises
We inventory the legal claims your site actually makes, check each against current Georgia authority, and hand you the list — every claim that’s now wrong, every one stated without a source, every page that predates a change it should reflect.
Fixed fee · delivered in under two weeksThe questions your clients actually type, and who gets cited when they ask — across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Claude — plus whether those answers are correct. Most aren’t. It tells you which questions are winnable and which are already lost.
Included with the auditIf you don’t like what you see, that’s where it ends and you keep the report. It’s yours either way.
Who this is for
Georgia personal injury first. The method travels to any practice built on rules that change — but we don’t sell a jurisdiction we aren’t maintaining.
Tell us your firm and your practice area. We’ll come back with what we find on your site — the claims that changed, the ones that cite nothing, and the questions you’re invisible for.
hello@stillcited.com